Topography and surface inhomgeneity

This text provided by Arve Kylling, NILU.
 
Description of the method applied to find topographical and surface
inhomogeneity effects for EDUCE sites including description of
necessary input data.

Summary of intentions
=====================
To investigate and quantify the influence of topography on surface
irradiance meausurements for the EDUCE stations. This will be done
using state-of-the-art three-dimensional radiative transfer
calculations.

Model details
=============
The three-dimensional radiative transfer calculations will be 
performed with MYSTIC (Monte Carlo code for the physically 
correct tracing of photons in cloudy atmospheres), see e.g.
Kylling et al. 2000 for a short overview and http://www.bmayer.de for
examples of its use. The model domains will be 201X201 km^2 with a
resolution of 1 km. Elevation information will be taken from the
GTOPO30 data set (Global 30 Arc Second Elevation data set, available
at http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/landdaac/gtopo30/gtopo30.html) and
regridded to 1X1 km^2 resolution using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT)
(Wessel and Smith, 1995}. Between these data points, the surface is
interpolated bilinearely by the model to calculate the appropriate
surface elevation and inclination at any location. 

Input parameters
================
Three wavelengths will be considered: 
       305 nm, strongly affected by ozone
       320 nm, somewhat affected by ozone
       340 nm, not affected by ozone

Since stations are located at very different latitudes it is not
appropriate to use the same standard set of szas for all
stations. However, for comparison reasons calculations will be carried
out for sza=60 for all stations. For selected stations other sza may
be considered. The sun will be in the south for all simulations (note
that for a flat Lambertian surface the result would not depend on
solar zenith angle).

For sites significantly shadowed by mountains or in highly
inhomogeneous regions (high montains, fiords, glacier) additional
calculations will be performed e.g. with and without snow. Examples of
such sites are Andøya and Sonnblick.

The effect of topography may be different on cloudy and cloudless
days. For some sites with large topography effects some cloudy
calculations will be performed to see if there is a cloud effect.

The background atmosphere will be taken from the atmosphere model of
Anderson et al. (1986).

Sites considered
================
The following sites listed on the the EDUCE metadata pages will be
considered:

              Sitename    Latitude Longitude Altitude (m)
             Thessaloniki   40.517   22.967   60.00 
                  Potsdam   52.363   13.068  107.00 
               Lindenberg   52.210   14.120  121.00 
         Hohenpeissenberg   47.804   11.018  980.00 
                 Brussels   50.800    4.350  120.00 
              fr_ustl_vda   50.650    3.100   60.00 
                    Ispra   45.814    8.627  214.00 
                Sodankyla   67.220   26.390  179.00 
                Jokioinen   60.814   23.499  107.00 
                Trondheim   63.430   10.470   20.00 
           Nea_Michaniona   40.471   22.848   20.00 
                     Rome   41.900   12.517   60.00 
                  Reading   51.450   -0.930   66.00 
                Sonnblick   47.050   12.950 3106.00 
   Vienna-Grossenzersdorf   48.120   16.330  150.00 
                   Andoya   69.483   16.017  380.00 


Character of expected results.
=============================
Report on the characterisation and quantification of
topographical and surface inhomogeneity effects for all EDUCE sites.

Possible problems
=================
None known

References
==========
Anderson, G., S. Clough, F. Kneizys, J. Chetwynd, and E. Shettle, AFGL 
  atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120 km),  Tech. Rep.
  AFGL-TR-86-0110, Air Force Geophys. Lab., Hanscom Air Force Base, Bedford,
  Mass., 1986.

Kylling, A., T. Persen, B. Mayer, and T. Svenøe,
  Determination of an Effective Spectral Surface Albedo From Ground
  Based Global and Direct UV Irradiance Measurements},
  J. Geophys. Res., 105, 4949-4959, 2000.

Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, New version of the Generic
  Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU, 76-(33), 329, 1995. 


Last change to these pages: 27 April 2001